What should a UPL do if a soldier refuses to participate in substance abuse prevention training?

The correct answer emphasizes the importance of documentation and communication within the chain of command in the context of substance abuse prevention training. When a soldier refuses to participate, the Unit Prevention Leader (UPL) must document the refusal to maintain accurate records of participation and compliance with training requirements. This documentation serves as a formal account of the incident, which can be crucial for any subsequent actions or reviews by leadership.

Following up with the commander is vital because they need to be aware of the situation to address any potential issues with the soldier's behavior or compliance with unit standards. This step also allows the commander to provide appropriate support or interventions tailored to the soldier's needs, reinforcing the unit's commitment to substance abuse prevention and the well-being of all personnel.

In contrast, simply reporting the soldier to higher command without documenting or following the proper protocol would likely bypass important steps that could address the root of the refusal. Conveying the importance of training verbally would not be sufficient if the soldier remains uncooperative, and ending the training session for that soldier does not address the underlying issue or document the refusal appropriately. Proper documentation and communication are key to maintaining accountability and ensuring that all soldiers understand the necessity of substance abuse prevention training.